What is the difference between luke and matthew beatitudes

Luke's teaching has a less formal structure with Jesus' teaching spelled out less formally, more simply. Mark's Gospel was the first Gospel written, and Matthew and Luke had access to it. They also seem to have another source, known as Q Source from the German Quelle, an additional source from which they selected material. The existence of Q has been questioned. The first three Gospels synoptics are similar in content, order of events and the words Jesus used.

Mark has verses while Matthew and Luke each have more than 1, Many parables are similar but are adjusted to reflect audience needs. Written by a Jew to Jews, Matthew's parables have a severe tone because Matthew blames the Jews, the chosen people, for being unfaithful to God. Luke is writing to Gentiles and has no need for this severity because he writes to those who are already converted.

One could analyze the differences, but what is clear is that these evangelists are faithful to their duty to bring Jesus to the people who lived 50 to 60 years after Jesus as they continue to do today. Whether we talk of Matthew 5.

Although differing in wording, they speak the same truths. Matthew addresses Jews so Jesus is presented as the new Moses, proclaiming a new revelation on a new Mount Sinai.

This "Sermon on the Mount" has Matthew's Jesus ascending the mountain, sitting down and preaching. Jesus' discourse introduced with unusual solemnity is where, after calling his disciples, he speaks to great crowds from the entire region. Luke's attitude is simpler in keeping with the tone of his whole Gospel.

He has Jesus speaking on a plain, thus being closer to the common people to help them understand Jesus in the Jewish tradition.

Blessings were often accompanied by an imposition of hands so the sense of touch conveyed the good from the one invoking to the one receiving. Recently Added. A Tribute to J.

Patterns of Evidence film series. A Tribute to Norman Leo Geisler Are the Gospels Reliable? McGrew Review. A Seismic Shift in the Inerrancy Debate. Billy Graham, Evangelism, Evangelicalism, and Inerrancy. On the arrangement of the group much has been written, most of it fanciful and unconvincing. The first four have been described as negative and passive, the second four as positive and active.

The first four, again, have been represented as pertaining to the desire for salvation, the second four as relating to its actual possession. Some writers have endeavored to trace in the group as a whole the steadily ascending stages in the development of the Christian character. The truth in this last suggestion lies in the reminder it brings that the Beatitudes are not to be thought of as setting forth separate types of Christian character, but as enumerating qualities and experiences that are combined in the ideal character as conceived by Christ--and as exemplified, it may be added, in His own life and person.

In respect of their structure, the Beatitudes are all alike in associating the blessing with a promise--a promise which is sometimes represented as having an immediate realization Mt ,10 , but in most cases has a future or even compare Mt an eschatological outlook.

The declaration of blessedness, therefore, is based not only on the possession of the quality or experience described, but on the present or future rewards in which it issues. The poor in spirit are called blessed not merely because they are poor in spirit, but because the kingdom of heaven is theirs; the mourners because they shall be comforted; those that hunger and thirst after righteousness because they shall be filled; those who are persecuted because a great reward is laid up for them in heaven.

The Beatitudes have often been criticized as holding up an ideal of which limitation, privation and self-renunciation are the essence, and which lacks those positive elements that are indispensable to any complete conception of blessedness. But when it is recognized that the blessing in every case rests on the associated promise, the criticism falls to the ground. Christ does demand of His followers a renunciation of many things that seem desirable to the natural heart, and a readiness to endure many other things from which men naturally shrink.

But just as in His own case the great self-emptying was followed by the glorious exaltation Php ff , so in the case of His disciples spiritual poverty and the bearing of the cross carry with them the inheritance of the earth and a great reward in heaven. Discover the power and simplicity of SwordSearcher: A complete scripture study package, with millions of cross-references, and thousands of topical and encyclopedic entries all linked to scripture, fully searchable and indexed by both topic and verse references.

Edited by James Orr, published in by Wm. Eerdmans Publishing Co.